Friday, December 23, 2005

ZENIT carried this story last night on Pope Benedict XVI's view of Vatican II and its implementation:

The crisis that arose in the Church after the Second Vatican Council wasn't due to the conciliar documents, but rather in their interpretation, says Benedict XVI.

According to Benedict XVI, the reception of the Council's messages took place according to two interpretations that "confronted each other and have had disputes between them."

The first interpretation is the one the Pope called "hermeneutics of discontinuity and rupture" "between the pre-conciliar and post-conciliar Church." According to this view, what is important about the Council is not its texts but the spirit of renewal brought to the Church, the Holy Father said. This view, he observed, "has often been able to make use of the media's liking, and also of a part of modern theology."

The other interpretation is "the hermeneutics of reform," which was proposed by the Popes who opened and closed the Council, John XXIII and Paul VI, and which is bearing fruits "in a silent but ever more visible way," said Benedict XVI. According to this view, the objective of the Council and of every reform in the Church is "to transmit the doctrine purely and fully, without diminutions or distortions," conscious that "our duty not only consists in guarding this precious treasure, as though we were concerned only with antiquity, but in dedicating ourselves with a firm will and without fear to the work that our age calls for," the Pope said.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posting will be light (as it has been) for the next week or so as the editorial staff at RequiemPress take a break to celebrate the Nativity.

We wish all our readers the joy and peace which Christ brings for you and your families.

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

As Christmas approaches...

We have been fairly silent here for about a week. As Christmas preparations intensify, we came across this wonderful advice from our Holy Father (courtesy of cwnews.com):

"During this period of preparation for Christmas, let us cultivate interior meditation, in order to welcome and safeguard Jesus in our lives," the Holy Father said at his Sunday Angelus audience. He called attention to the example set by St. Joseph, who maintained an interior silence "interwoven with constant prayer" as he awaited the birth of Jesus.

"Let us allow ourselves to be infected by the silence of St. Joseph," the Pontiff encouraged his listeners. "We need it very much, in a world that is often too noisy."

Monday, December 12, 2005

Robert Royal (President of the Faith & Reason Institute in Washington DC) wrote a review of "Catholic Laity in the Mission of the Church") for the 9 December 2005 NCR(eporter). Unfortunately susbscription is needed to view the column entitled, "Pondering the meaning of lay vocation." It does not appear that RequiemPress is mentioned as the publisher (from the copy I received-I am not a subscriber). However this may explain (along with the December crisis Magazine excerpt of the book) why since Friday, Russell Shaw's "Catholic Laity" has twice climbed on the Amazon.com sales rank from the several hundred thousand range to the lofty heights of the low 20 thousands....

Anyway, here's a couple of lines from the review:

One of Mr. Shaw's rare qualities is that he does not fit into any neat ideological framework...There is much to ponder in the story he tells and the recommendation he makes. If you are truly interested in light, rather than heat, on these difficult questions, it is worth spending a few contemplative hours with Russell Shaw.

Thursday, December 08, 2005

The Council

As today is the 40th anniversary of the close of Vatican II, much space has been given to this topic in various periodicals, blogs, speeches etc. One article in particular has been emailed to me several times, and which I have seen links to on other sites, such as Seattle Catholic. Here is a direct to the article by a Walter Brandmüller. The people circulating the article or linking to it seem to be generally of those who are critical of Vatican II because of the confusion and abuse in the Church in the last 40 years. The irony in this is that the article itself shows how upheaval after a council is not unexpected if you are a student of history:

Comparing II Vatican Council with the first Council of Nicaea (325), the Council of Trent (1545-1563) and Vatican I, and bearing in mind their respective consequences, it becomes clear that a schism took place after both Vatican Councils. First, in 1871, there were the “old Catholics” protesting against the definitions of the primacy and the infallibility of the pope; then in 1988 there were Archbishop Lefebvre and his supporters. As ideologically opposed as these two movements appear, they both represent the rejection of legitimate developments in the doctrine and life of the Church – a rejection based on a distorted relationship with history. After the Nicaean Council began religious battles that were to grow in bitterness and violence for over a century until the Nicaean doctrine was imposed at the Council of Chalcedon (451). This comparison can also be drawn with the Council of Trent, which produced an extraordinary growth spurt in the missionary, religious and cultural life of those parts of Europe that had remained Catholic – the “miracle of Trent” of which Hubert Jedin spoke. This growth did not come suddenly, however: after the Council ended, more than a century passed before its dogmatic and reforming decrees would show results on a significant scale.

I commented on my personal blog this morning how the knowledge and understanding of history is so important in life and in the life of the Church.

Tuesday, December 06, 2005

Benedict XVI on the laity...

In a meeting with Polish bishops on Saturday Pope Benedict XVI said this (from ZENIT) :

Finally, the Holy Father acknowledged that in the midst of the "silent apostasy" that is verified in some societies, the laity has an "irreplaceable" task, "as it takes place in daily life, in ambits which the priests can only reach with difficulty."

"Participation in public and political life is a specific task of the laity," he reminded, assuring that "one and all have the right and duty to participate in politics."

"The Church does not identify with any party, with any political community, or any political system," the Pontiff said. "Rather, she always reminds that lay people involved in political life must give a courageous and visible witness of Christian values, which must be affirmed and defended in case they are threatened."

The laity must carry out this task "publicly either in debates of a political nature or in the media," he explained.

For political action to be effective, it must be based on "the love of truth and the spirit of service and solidarity in the commitment for the common good," explained the Pope.

Monday, December 05, 2005

The Knights of Columbus magazine Columbia has devoted its December issue to the 4oth anniversary of the closing of the 2nd Vatican Council. Russell Shaw writes his regular column and a second one on Vatican II. (Which mentions his new book...)You can read the article online here.

There is also a book excerpt from "The Right to be Wrong - Ending the Culture War Over Religion in America" by Kevin Seamus Hansson (Encounter Books). (Unfortunately this article in not online.) The excerpt is very interesting, dealing with the "Know-Nothing" party and persecution of Catholics in America. I had read years ago [I believe in The Catholic Home Educator(?)] about the attempts to shut down Catholic schools in Washington State early in the 20th Century (which resulted in a Supreme Court decision recognizing parental rights in the choosing the education of their children), and the fact that many public school systems were built and expanded with the express purpose to "Americanize" (read Protestanize) the new waves of Catholic immigrants from Ireland and Italy. You certainly don't read much about this in the history books in any school system.

Reminder as posted below, John Meehan will be signing his newest book, "Two Towers: the de-Christianization of America and a Plan for Renewal" on December 6th (feast of St. Nicholas) at 7:00 PM (refreshments are at 6:30, followed by talk and booksigning) in the Immaculate Heart of Mary Church parish hall (Louden Road, Concord, NH).

Friday, December 02, 2005

Reminder

Here's a reminder: John Meehan will be signing his newest book, "Two Towers: the de-Christianization of America and a Plan for Renewal" on December 6th (feast of St. Nicholas) at 7:00 PM (refreshments are at 6:30, followed by talk and booksigning) in the Immaculate Heart of Mary Church parish hall (Louden Road, Concord, NH). If you are in that area, stop by. If not you can buy a book here. We have been lifting an occasional excerpt in the posts below.

Thursday, December 01, 2005

Advent and Christmas and America

I don't recall what other families did in my town when I was growing up about Christmas decorations and celebrations. Of course I lived in the highly Catholic (maybe in name only) Northeast. But I don't recall a practice which is common in South Carolina-which is to have your Christmas tree taken down and on the curb by December 26th-if not before. (I have seen trees on the curb on Christmas day.) Protestant America celebrates Christmas from the day after Thanksgiving til about 10:00 AM (or maybe 6:00 PM) on Christmas day. Unfortunately, Catholic America is following the trend. When we get the liturgical year mixed up, we also get our theology messed up also. Catholic culture in this country (see related post below here) has become non-existant and by and large we have joined the Protestant-secular culture.

"Two Towers-the de-Christianization of America and a Plan for Renewal" (RequiemPress -of course) gives some reasons why this occurred:

On the back of the American dollar bill is found the motto novus ordo seclorum (a new secular order), confirming that in this country a secular order has been set in place. Since science and technology animate it, that secular order is strictly pragmatic. It seeks to create a society peopled by contented citizens. In 1853, for instance, the United States Democratic Review predicted that “within half a century, machinery will perform all work — automata will direct them. The only tasks of the human race will be to make love, study, and be happy.” In this country, then, individuals have been provided with practical opportunities to obtain unlimited wealth and to pursue personal comfort. In turn, the pursuit of wealth and comfort has led to rapid advancements in technology, the practical side of science.


Tocqueville pointed out that, in the United States, “every new way of getting wealth more quickly, every machine which lessens work, every means of diminishing the costs of production, every invention which makes pleasures easier orgreater, seems the most magnificent accomplishment of the human mind.”


In a very short span of time, an economic middle-class that desired increased wealth, material pleasure, and bodily comfort became a prominent cultural factor in American life. Tocqueville noted that “the passion for physical comfort is essentially a middle-class affair; it grows and spreads with that class and becomes preponderant with it.” He added that “the taste for physical well-being is not always exclusive, but it is general; and though all do not feel it in the same manner, yet it is felt by all. Everyone is preoccupied with caring for the slightest needs of the body and the trivial conveniences of life.”


The ever-expanding middle class soon discovered that expropriation of the natural resources of the North American continent gave it social influence and political power. Every technological invention and every step of growth in the local, regional, and national economies increased these two possibilities. Every leap forward in economic prosperity was a progressive advance in greater equality of conditions and its personal benefits — political power and social influence.


Unduly enamored with the power of equality of conditions, Catholic immigrants and their descendants readily transferred their allegiance from the paternalism of the institutional Church to the paternalism of secular government, be it local, state, or federal. Since the exercise of paternalistic authority was quite familiar to them, most Catholics embraced with facility the economic, political, and social benefits that derived from the spirit of liberty. In fact, most Catholics willingly became inculturated into the new secular order. Working their way toward the “golden calf” of economic prosperity, and the benefits of political power and social influence, they became what can only be called, “American Catholics.”


The enormous wealth generated in the post-World War II era by a free-enterprise marketplace was unprecedented in the history of this country and of the world. So, beside political liberty, a capitalistic system now provided Catholics with economic liberty. Thus, too many Catholics changed from Faith-rich but materially impoverished childlike believers to materially-rich but Faith impoverished de-Christianized Americans. A friend of mine described the changeover this way: “Scientific and technological advances have so established themselves in the Catholic mind, and the political and social advantages have become so obvious, and the promises of economic freedom and material happiness are so great, why should any baptized person rely on the Catholic Church or the Deposit of Faith? Why should he or she not be American first and Catholic second?”

Vatican official, Josef Cardinal Ratzinger, said the same thing, but in more general terms:

"Of course it is easier for the moment to take pleasure in material things, in what is tangible, in things that bring us happiness and can be directly bought and accessed . . . This is a dreadfully strong temptation. In this way, happiness becomes a commodity that can be bought and sold . . . The question concerning God now seems quite unnecessary."