Speaking of All Souls Day...the previous posts, among other things, have talked about the apostolates and spirituality of the laity-one thing all the laity (and in fact all the Church Militant has in common), is the duty to pray for the Church Suffering-the holy souls in purgatory. (Requiem Press took its name recalling the prayer of the Church (Requiem aeternam dona eis Domine, et lux perpetua luceat eis. Requiescant in pace. Amen. — that is: Eternal rest grant to them O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon them. May they rest in peace. Amen.) to foster devotion to the holy souls. In fact our first publication was a booklet (tried to upload image, but blogger is finicky this morning) which has a prayer for each day of the week for the holy souls in purgatory. (You can see it at Requiem Press, scroll to the bottom. It is on sale for large quantity orders until November 2nd).
******************************************************************************
Getting back to Russell Shaw for a moment, he is giving a presentation: "Vatican II Series: Apostolicam Actuositatem (Apostolate of Lay People)" at the Catholic Information Center (1501 K Street NW, Washington, DC) on November 3 at 12:45 PM. If you are in area, be sure to stop by.
************************************************************* *****************
We wonder how this country has gotten to its present state of immorality, faithlessness, and political corruption; how we can legally kill 4000 babies a day and starve Terry Schiavo to death. If there are so many good people who share a moral code, (as evidenced for instance by the series of referendums in which homosexual marriage was soundly defeated in the last election cycle) how is it that things have gotten to the present state of affairs? I recall reading in "Years of Crisis" by James Hitchcock (Ignatius Press) many years ago the following:
At the heart of moral conservatism is a contradiction which the traditionalist dimly senses and which increases his irritation. For if the nature of traditionalism is the preference for a settled, stable, and placid personal life, then this life will necessarily be disrupted by the very act of defending it....What is involved here is not mere laziness. Moral traditionalists often involve themselves deeply in the activities of their churches, their children's schools....In other words, the traditionalist prefers to give himself to activities which are directly relevant to the family, while liberal activists see political goals, fought for in the public arena, as alone worthwhile. (emphasis added)
I think there is much truth here. Additionally, large families demand more time at home as opposed to political fund-raisers and rallies, etc. - although sometimes these can be family activities themselves. Also, I tend to think that many Americans in normal times trust those whom they elected, and only come up for air to see if a change is needed at election time. They don't participate in the political process on an ongoing basis. So what are we to do?
The first place of course is with personal holiness. (I have heard that Mother Teresa would make her nuns complete their morning prayer time before engaging in their care of the homeless and sick.) A priest at our old parish used to preach that all apostolic activity should arise from our prayer life.
The example of living a virtuous life, being open to discussions with friends and neighbors on the important things - simply, sanctifying our daily life and activities-are basic things we must do. Many want to do or be part of something BIG-that is something the world sees as BIG. What we often fail to recognize is that the simple attention to our prayer life and trying to sanctify the temporal order by living each moment in the presence of God REALLY IS something BIG.
Then there will be other things that come along.
I think the "Catholic blog community" is a group apostolate of sorts. We have several people looking and talking about what a Catholic worldview-based political party would look like, (see here). We have others discussing Land Use, surburbia and Catholicism (see here). There is a philisophical forum (here). A group of Catholic lawyers post on political issues (here.) Catholic writers, librarians, publishers, priests, and every sort of laity post daily or weekly on issues of Catholic interest in open forums. Most Catholic bloggers probably don't look at their blogs as apostolates, but individually and collectively this can viewed as an apostolate itself: discussion of the important ideas in a public forum to search for the truth-unabashedly Catholic and orthodox.
3 Comments:
Jim,
While I think the statement you post has some merit, I think the author misses the big point. Conservatives/Traditionalists do very little because most of them are libertarians having no appreciation for the common good. When I first read the "Christian Liberty Party" platform, this immediately jumped out at me. Not one mention of the common good, and a definition of property rights that would make Adam Smith look like a pinko. Conservatives generally feel that everyone should pull themselves up by their own bootstraps; take care of themselves and maybe their nuclear family. Of course this view is very liberal and at odds with Catholic social teaching, but that is my point. Conservatism/Traditionalism in America is nothing but right wing liberalism.
Greetings, Jim. Some good topics here.
Christopher, you make a valid point about the common good, but you may be a little too hard on American conservatives and traditionalists. The United States is unique in that relgious pluralism - from the very beginning - prevented religious ideals of the common good from getting very far. The relative "peace" that we have enjoyed is largely the result of a mutual agreement amongst various Christian groups not to impose their ideals on the rest.
We have become accustomed to accepting the lowest common denominator - freedom for the family and the individual under a vaguely Christian moral framework -because it is the only thing that is politically possible under the circumstances.
It is likely true that this American "solution" could only be temporary and contains within it the seeds of further dissolution. But it is also true that we are faced with only two choices: politics that is compromised but possible, or politics without compromise that is hopelessly and permanently marginalized.
At some point, the "possible" becomes a joke and the only thing worth fighting for is the whole Catholic enchilada. Have we reached that point today? That, gentelmen, is the first question that must be answered before a third party is launched.
Christopher, You and I have much agreement on the subject of the problems with 'American conservatism' as we discussed this summer. As I indicated then, I am still discovering from time to time in myself remnants of American protestantism culture/ideas which surface-these are so embedded in our life, politics, schools, and even in American bishops (past and present) etc. that we recognize it with difficulty.
That said, I personally haven't given more than a cursory glance at the "Christian Liberty Party" (CLP) platform due to time contraints at the moment. Yet I think this platform (and the forum set up to discuss it) is the very type of place where some of these root errors of 'American-brand conservatism' can be exposed. It is an opportunity.
As far as James Hitchcock's statement, it is one that has stuck with me for years - (I think I first read it before I had a family.) Yet there is another aspect to it. The Curley's have gone to the local March for Life event at the state capital in January for many years; but lately, I have left early upset and wondering if I will return. The past few years it has been more of a Bush rally than a pro-life march. Many true Catholics and conservatives won't spend the time fighting for something in the public forum unless the leader of the fight is someone you can truly stand behind. Thus I don't think either of the major political parties we have now will ever be a real home for the real Catholic.
Jeff, I think Chris' point is that we conservatives and moral traditionalists have been so influenced by that pluralism that we don't recognize it or recognize when it conflicts with Catholic social teaching.
We can't forget that this country is inebriated with protestant thought, and that protestants controlled every portion of governement (schools...) for many years. Catholics got political power by promising overtly or covertly to stay this course.
I think as/if the CLP moves ahead, it should understand that Catholic social teaching should be consulted thoroughly. (Framers should study these documents thoroughly and truly be excellent thinkers, philosophers in the tradition of Augustine and Aquinas and...)
Post a Comment
<< Home